Dear Vladimir,
> When it comes to code-related changes, the reviews are vague, and it is
> really hard (impossible?) to find consensus.
I somehow got an idea that ripping out classes that could lead to a
NoClassDefFoundError for existing users did not fit the definition of "binary
compability" f
Dear Ralph,
> The reason I brought this up is that it seems there are two groups here. One
> that wants to get a release
> out and then put Log4j 1 back in the coffin and another that wants to
> resurrect it.
Do you think there may be a middle ground here? In other words, users who think
that
