n this will give log4j2 a longer lease of life
which will be very important for people who have moved there from log4j-v1
and don't want to go near log4j3 for a long time yet. Also I am sure many
projects will be on jdk-8 for quite some time yet.
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
my comment is below:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 14:23, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022, at 08:21, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> > As for infringing on the log4j trademark, I will rename the repo to
> > something else, for example "re4j".
> >
> > As mentioned in my previous message,
>
> If you have other proposals feel free to state them.
>
> This discussion will be followed up by a vote thread if necessary.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 15:13, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Vladimir, mind helping us to quantify this "need", please? To the best of
> my knowledge, nobody has reached out to us with such a request except you
> and Leo.
That's not quite right. A while ago I asked if the RedHat fix could be
added to l
https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/blob/master/pom.xml
> >
> > Leads to question: how do we feel about removal of .lf5 (javax.swing
> > logging) and .chainsaw (java.awt logging) packages?
> >
> > It's an old change that was already on the trunk.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/log4j/pull/16/commits/5c29c4048b4860aa7f6a86420f20208459e6c22c#diff-9c5fb3d1b7e3b0f54bc5c4182965c4fe1f9023d449017cece3005d3f90e8e4d8R251
> >
> > I can understand why it was made.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Leo
> >
>
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
then some other items).
> I’ve been adapting our test tooling to use the JUnit 5 extension API which
> is fairly different from the v4 API, and I don’t think I’ve even ported
> over all the functionality of LoggerContextRule yet.
>
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
re
> frameworks?
>
> Please let me know.
>
> Regards
> Suthish
>
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
internal” off of core.
> Rather than having internal directories all over the place I am thinking we
> should mimic the same existing package structure under the internal
> directory and move private classes there.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ralph
>
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
me/why-was-log4j-2-created. I plan to write
> a few entries on what is new in Log4J.
>
> Ralph
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
to perform a release.
>> > Log4j 1.x supported an ancient version of the JDK (1.2?). I am not even
>> > sure if that is possible any more. The oldest version I have installed
>> is
>> > 1.7. I would have no idea how to validate that it was still compatible.
>>
e that it was still compatible.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Dec 15, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Gary Gregory
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Security issues should not be discussed in public for obvious reasons.
> > > Please see https://www.apache.org/security/
&g
; On Dec 15, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Security issues should not be discussed in public for obvious reasons.
> > Please see https://www.apache.org/security/
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 7:01 AM Andrew Marlow
>
?
--
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
13 matches
Mail list logo
