I am finding this email confusing. I think it is due to the formatting but I am
not sure. I am making my best guess.
Vote 1: Enable certain branch protection features on the code branches (`2.x`
and `main`) of all non-dormant Java repos:
I can’t vote on this as I don’t know what the impact of t
Hi,
Vote 1. Require a pull request before merging:
+1
Vote 2. Require conversation resolution before merging:
+1
Vote 3. Require linear history (Prevent merge commits from being pushed
to code branches. Only "Squash" and similar allowed):
-0.9
I really like a linear history, but I see some prob
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:12 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
> So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
> l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta, l-log4j-kotlin, l-log4j-samples,
> l-log4j-scala, l-log4j-transform,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:07 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:12 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
> > So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
> > l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta,
