This is essentially what I proposed long ago in Log4j Boot. They’d be pom files
with the appropriate dependencies marked in for simplicity of end users. Could
still be useful.
> On Jan 19, 2025, at 03:02, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Maven is notably bad at handling optional depend
Hi Gary,
On 21.01.2025 13:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
This all sounds very confusing to me. Using this scheme, I could
create a set of dependencies on 2.x with empty jars that don't work on
3.x (because I picked the wrong jars). There is no way to verify that
what I'm doing on 2.x will work on 3.x w
This all sounds very confusing to me. Using this scheme, I could
create a set of dependencies on 2.x with empty jars that don't work on
3.x (because I picked the wrong jars). There is no way to verify that
what I'm doing on 2.x will work on 3.x without trying it on 3.x, so...
or am I missing someth
