Re: Archiving Chainsaw and Flume GitHub repositories

2025-01-15 Thread Ralph Goers
-1 on Flume Despite you not seeing visible evidence I am still working on these. I am actually fairly confident I will need to create releases of Flume in the next 6 months. Ralph > On Jan 15, 2025, at 2:05 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Chainsaw and Flume projects have been moved to dormant

Re: Archiving Chainsaw and Flume GitHub repositories

2025-01-15 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Volkan, On 15.01.2025 10:03, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: *I suggest archiving¹ `logging-chainsaw` and `logging-flume*` GitHub repositories. Objections?* +1 Could you also archive/remove the `2.3.x` and `2.12.x` web pages. As recent questions show, these are still used. Piotr

Archiving Chainsaw and Flume GitHub repositories

2025-01-15 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Chainsaw and Flume projects have been moved to dormant state with PMC consensus. Yet their GitHub repositories (i.e., `logging-chainsaw` and `logging-flume*`) don't reflect this and they weekly get flagged by GitHub due to vulnerable dependencies. This is also confusing for users, since the list o