The source code is the same for all platforms, so we only need to run
it on one builder.
I took a brief look earlier, but I'm busy this weekend so I can take a
closer look next week.
-Robert Middleton
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 2:10 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:09 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 16:34, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > My proposal is to allow a user to _not_ define any custom filters by
> reusing a new Result enum value called “Throw”. When a filter returns
> “Throw”, then Log4j throws
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 2:08 PM Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, at 19:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I'm not crazy about having to bounce around sections of various repos in
> > addition to monitoring emails, which has to be done anyway. It's
> _another_
> > thing to lose trac
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 08:36, Stephen Webb wrote:
>
> That would be much simpler. I was not aware that option was available. Is
> there an example I can copy?
I added a prototype as PR #414[1]:
* I added a `package.sh` script that can be used to generate the
source archives in a repr
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, at 19:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'm not crazy about having to bounce around sections of various repos in
> addition to monitoring emails, which has to be done anyway. It's _another_
> thing to lose track of :-( Having a repo just to use the discussion feature
> feels like a
I'm not crazy about having to bounce around sections of various repos in
addition to monitoring emails, which has to be done anyway. It's _another_
thing to lose track of :-( Having a repo just to use the discussion feature
feels like a hack.
I wish I could find the thread about new reddit-like FO
Hi Volkan,
I would prefer option 1.3, because most of the users will look for discussions
in the most relevant Github repo (for them).
I'm not a fan of Discourse (another app to install and no integration with
Github).
Let's try and find out whether it works for us.
We need to decide, whether
That is something we can decide together:
1. Have project-specific discussion repositories (i.e., Log4j users will
use `logging-log4j2`, LogNet users will use `logging-log4net`, and so on)
2. Have a shared discussion repository (e.g., we can create
`logging-discuss` repository and crea
