Gary has a failure on L361, that is, it retries every 100ms to succeed with
`logger.info()` for at most 2mins. I doubt if more waiting will solve the
problem. I tried to improve that test several times (see its history), but
Windows just behaves weird with sockets. I'd appreciate it if Windows user
Hi Gary,
On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 16:50, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> I just pulled main since we've had changes there, now I get:
>
> [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.31
> s <<< FAILURE! -- in
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconne
Ah, thank you.
Gary
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 9:50 AM Jan Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> please see
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/v8kyxz7zdvp3cypo1506yflk3bbvysym
>
> I did not change the subject to [RESULT].
>
> Regards.
>
> Jan
>
> On 16 September 2024 15:17:06 CEST, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
I just pulled main since we've had changes there, now I get:
[ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.31 s
<<< FAILURE! -- in
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconnectTest
[ERROR]
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconne
Hi Gary,
please see https://lists.apache.org/thread/v8kyxz7zdvp3cypo1506yflk3bbvysym
I did not change the subject to [RESULT].
Regards.
Jan
On 16 September 2024 15:17:06 CEST, Gary Gregory wrote:
>I don't think I saw a [RESULT] message with a tally of the result.
>
>Gary
>
>On Sun, Sep 15, 20
I don't think I saw a [RESULT] message with a tally of the result.
Gary
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 3:26 PM Davyd McColl wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Apologies for the late response. FWIW, my +1 too.
>
> -d
>
>
> On 15 September 2024 20:59:13 Jan Friedrich wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > and here is my +1.
> >
> > W
