Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

I am fine with this plan. Ralph > On Aug 9, 2024, at 1:35 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 20:29, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> Well, one thing that changed in JUL is that it requires the java.logging >> module. Otherwise, the Java 8+ stuff is for the System.Log

Re: Integration tests

I believe I have asked for a log4j-its module for a while now since that is the only way you can validate modules actually work together. I am fine with it being in a separate repo. Ralph > On Aug 8, 2024, at 11:35 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi all, > > Unless I am mistaken, adding test

Re: Staging site

Hi, Does the tech we use to build/host allow for the inclusion of a search box, say at the top? Javadoc now includes a search box which is quite a nice feature IMO. Gary On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 3:02 AM Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi all, > > We finished revamping the documentation of Log4j 2. Th

Re: Staging site

On the front page: "Batteries included" Err... what? Let's not get cute here please. Gary On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 3:02 AM Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi all, > > We finished revamping the documentation of Log4j 2. The result is > available on the staging site: > > https://logging.staged.apache.or