Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

> On May 30, 2024, at 7:43 AM, John Engebretson wrote: > > I agree on the complexity argument - and FWIW we still have many apps on > JDK 8 and are intimidated by the Spring upgrade, so I understand that. :) > Sounds like we agree there's no runtime impact? > John > I am not sure what y

Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

I agree on the complexity argument - and FWIW we still have many apps on JDK 8 and are intimidated by the Spring upgrade, so I understand that. :) Sounds like we agree there's no runtime impact? John On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 9:31 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > On May 30, 2024, at 6:37 AM, En

Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

> On May 30, 2024, at 6:37 AM, Engebretson, John > wrote: > > On 2024/04/10 01:45:19 Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 9, 2024, at 3:52 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: >>> >>> >>> BTW: Maybe SLF4J still uses Java 8, but the latest Logback uses Java 11. >> >> Ask me if I care about Logback