On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:58 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:48 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:30 AM Piotr P. Karwasz <
> piotr.karw...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ralph,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 07:03, Ralph Goers
> >> wrote:
> 1.
> On Mar 21, 2024, at 3:19 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
>
> PS: In the `main` branch I plan to replace the default
> ReusableMessageFactory with ReusableLogEventFactory:
>
> * this change should have a minimal impact on memory (events are not
> much larger than messages),
> * it can skip a
> On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:48 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:30 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 07:03, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
1. Raman and Mikko would like to bind context data to an object
implementing the `Logger` inter
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:19 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Raman,
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 22:51, Raman Gupta wrote:
> > > > For example, a User could configure a custom MessageFactory that
> > > provides an extension of MapMessage that causes the message to include
> data
> > > from the cla
Hi Raman,
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 22:51, Raman Gupta wrote:
> > > For example, a User could configure a custom MessageFactory that
> > provides an extension of MapMessage that causes the message to include data
> > from the class or resource. Going to the extreme of trying to shoehorn in
> > Conte
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:30 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 07:03, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> > > 1. Raman and Mikko would like to bind context data to an object
> > > implementing the `Logger` interface or more generally to a service
> > > object (e.g. resource ma
+1, release the artifacts.
I repeated the same checks as in RC2:
* distribution hashes: OK
* distribution signatures: OK
* Maven artifacts are reproducible: OK
* Maven artifacts are the same as binary distribution: OK
* new artifacts are documented on the website.
Piotr
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 1
https://www.javadoc.io/doc/org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-api/3.0.0-alpha1/org.apache.logging.log4j/org/apache/logging/log4j/LogManager.html
Pass your custom MessageFactory here. It’s an optional argument when creating
the Logger.
Also, I’m not sure where to even find the current javadocs for t
What do you mean? That is exactly the link I shared in the very first
section of the VOTE email you responded to. See the `=== Timing &
Differences` header. Note that you don't need to trust the GitHub view, you
can diff RC2 and RC3 using their commit IDs available in the associated
VOTE emails.
O
What's the difference with RC2?
TY,
Gary
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, 11:46 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.8.0 (RC3).
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 7d157b61e198e
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.8.0 (RC3).
Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
Commit: 7d157b61e198e3baca816129d8d406b300436e2f
Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j-tools
Nexus
I need to cancel this RC2 VOTE.
Encountered another shortcoming.
I will issue an RC3 promptly.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:34 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.8.0 (RC2).
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
> GitHub: https://github
Ralph, could you show how those two users can use a `MessageFactory` to
create `Logger`s with predefined additional context data?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 7:25 AM Ralph Goers wrote:
> Unfortunately this is another message I somehow didn't get in my inbox.
> Replying to it via lists.a.o is not a g
Hi Ralph,
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 07:03, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > 1. Raman and Mikko would like to bind context data to an object
> > implementing the `Logger` interface or more generally to a service
> > object (e.g. resource manager, DAO and variants),
>
> Yes, I’ve seen that. Personally, I am not
Hi Ralph,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 17:11, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> 1. I am experimenting with adding Thread support to ScopedContext as we
> speak. It should be straightforward.
>
> I am not sure we ever want to deal with ScopedValue. ScopedContext provides
> the same functionality plus integration
15 matches
Mail list logo