Ah, ok, then I'll abstain from voting until we have a version I can
build locally.
TY for the heads up.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:24 PM Jan Friedrich wrote:
>
> Hello Gary,
>
> https://paste.apache.org/1ropz looks like you're building 2.0.16?
> Building the current version is currently ver
Hello Gary,
https://paste.apache.org/1ropz looks like you're building 2.0.16?
Building the current version is currently very difficult due to the many target
frameworks: net20;net35;net40;net40-client;net45;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0
You need to have each SDK for them and especially the old on
Argh … yeah … sorry for that … indeed I missed that :-)
Thanks for clarifying.
Chris
Von: Volkan Yazıcı
Datum: Freitag, 15. März 2024 um 17:49
An: dev@logging.apache.org
Cc: cd...@apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Feedback] Personal feedback on you last vote on Log4j 2.23.1
I responded to the VOTE em
I responded to the VOTE email, stated "Adding my +1", and changed the
subject to `[RESULT][VOTE]`:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbvg5kx3mkw4vhyp13rxlojtkrpyzsdk
Could it be that you missed my +1 due to the subject change?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:39 PM Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> w
What about the failure?
Gary
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 11:35 AM Davyd McColl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, everything should be done via npm scripts. So I should remove any
> confusing .cmd files.
>
> As for the version, I should update that, but it's minor. That version
> comes from package.json and will o
Hi all,
while going through the projects latest activity activity as part of my
preparation for next week's board meeting, I came across a vote that was
announced successfull even if only 2 votes were cast.
I assume that the RM (Volkan) implicitly counted his vote as +1, but we do
actually nee
Hi
Yes, everything should be done via npm scripts. So I should remove any
confusing .cmd files.
As for the version, I should update that, but it's minor. That version
comes from package.json and will only show when running npm commands. But I
admit it's confusing.
-d
On 15 March 2024 16:
We might need better build instructions... for me at least ;-)
I take it the build.cmd file should be removed since it's not mentioned in
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/blob/master/doc/BUILDING.md ?
BUILDING.md contains a section called "TL;DR (!Windows):" which is too easy to
confu
I think this is perfectly valid, he only shared the GitHub view to the
`rel/2.0.17-rc1` tag – which is immutable due to `rel/`-prefix. He
could have maybe explicitly stated it, but not a biggie, IMHO. If you
don't like the GitHub view, you can clone the repository locally and
checkout the tag yours
Hi and thank you for RM'ing this release.
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel/2.0.17-rc1
This is no good IMO, you should provide an _apache_ link.
Gary
On 2024/03/15 12:28:03 Davyd McColl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17.
>
> We
Hi all,
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17.
Website:
https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html
GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net
GitHub release (pre-release):
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel/2.0.17-rc1
Dis
11 matches
Mail list logo
