I would prefer logging-log4j-server.
Gary
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 11:31 Ralph Goers wrote:
> We currently have logging-log4j-tools which contains the log server code.
> The log4j server isn’t really a tool so I would propose that the repo
> either be renamed to logging-log4j-samples or logging-lo
Hi Ralph,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 17:31, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> We currently have logging-log4j-tools which contains the log server code. The
> log4j server isn’t really a tool so I would propose that the repo either be
> renamed to logging-log4j-samples or logging-log4j-server. The pros and con
We currently have logging-log4j-tools which contains the log server code. The
log4j server isn’t really a tool so I would propose that the repo either be
renamed to logging-log4j-samples or logging-log4j-server. The pros and cons are:
logging-log4j-samples:
Pros:
1. Other sample code cur
