Re: Log4j 2.18.0

2022-05-24 Thread Ralph Goers
I’ve created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3516 for this. Ralph > On May 24, 2022, at 9:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > >> On May 24, 2022, at 2:25 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz >> wrote: >> >> The 'log4j:log4j' dependency is only used in some performance tests, which >> probably sho

Re: Log4j 2.18.0

2022-05-24 Thread Ralph Goers
> On May 24, 2022, at 2:25 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > The 'log4j:log4j' dependency is only used in some performance tests, which > probably should move to `log4j-perf`: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/890. > If we also upgrade `h2` the `log4j-api` and `log4j-core` artifact

Re: Log4j 2.18.0

2022-05-24 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Volkan, On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 20:41, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > That is a spot on remark with security updates, in particular > Jackson-related ones, Piotr. Yes, we shouldn't indeed ship 2.18.0 without > the Jackson updates. I presume you are already taking care of this? > Yes, Jackson is updat

Re: Log4j 2.18.0

2022-05-24 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
That is a spot on remark with security updates, in particular Jackson-related ones, Piotr. Yes, we shouldn't indeed ship 2.18.0 without the Jackson updates. I presume you are already taking care of this? > Removing the `log4j` 1.x dependency from `log4j-core` What do you exactly mean? `log4j-core