OSGi seems to use re-packaged versions of Log4j2 most of the time
anyways for some reason. See for example
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/paxlogging/pages/499613746/Configuring+Log4J2
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:24 AM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that options 1 & 2 may not work well
It occurs to me that options 1 & 2 may not work well with OSGi and possibly
JPMS.
JPMS will require that the module have a unique name. It would need a
module-info
that specifies it requires org.apache.log4j. But users of this jar would be
requesting
org.apache.log4j and the jar would have to
I took a brief look earlier this week, it's a large PR, so I plan on
looking carefully Saturday.
Gary
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022, 01:07 Ralph Goers wrote:
> I have finished the initiatives I had wanted to complete for this release
> and am now going through the list of open issues and PRs. I am hopef
