Is this a side effect of the reproducible build change to the POM? Is
sounds like we need to set the end year of the Javadoc plugin explicitly.
Gary
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 13:26 Matt Sicker wrote:
> Well that looks like a time stamp of 0 or so with a time zone offset.
>
> —
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On
Well that looks like a time stamp of 0 or so with a time zone offset.
—
Matt Sicker
> On Jan 8, 2022, at 04:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Our Javadoc say "Copyright © 1999-1969 ..." on
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-api/apidocs/index.html
>
> Gary
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, at 05:11, Julius Davies wrote:
> One person's EOL is another person's open source business model ! (RHEL
> subscriptions are not cheap!)
I doubt anybody would actually pay for log4j.
>
> Anyway, quick FYI - I noticed Atlassian has rev'd log4j-1.2.17 fifteen
> times !
Our Javadoc say "Copyright © 1999-1969 ..." on
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-api/apidocs/index.html
Gary
I asked a few questions in the wiki comment section.
>Remove “strange” interfaces that had to be created before Java 8 provided
default methods.
Looking at our Javadoc, it seems we forgot to deprecate our copy of
BiConsumer. We did deprecate our copy of Supplier so that's good.
Gary
On Sat, Jan
