+1, option 1
Apologies for the delay, took me a while to find the original email.
-d
On December 29, 2021 21:33:35 "Christian Grobmeier"
wrote:
Hello,
as discussed in another thread, this is a vote about the future of log4j 1.
This vote stays open for the usual 72h.
Options are explain
+1, option 1
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
them.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 22:19 Remko Popma wrote:
> +1 for Option 1
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:51 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> > +1, Option 1
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, 20:33 Christian Grobmeier
> > w
+1 for Option 1
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:51 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> +1, Option 1
>
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, 20:33 Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > as discussed in another thread, this is a vote about the future of log4j
> > 1. This vote stays open for the usual 72h.
> > Options
+1, Option 1
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, 20:33 Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as discussed in another thread, this is a vote about the future of log4j
> 1. This vote stays open for the usual 72h.
> Options are explained below.
>
> You can vote for:
>
> [ ] +1, Option 1
> [ ] +1, Option 2
>
Guten Tag Stephen Webb,
am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 um 04:51 schrieben Sie:
> Once the branches diverge, git cherry-pick is the better merge process.
They have diverged already and all changes from master were decided to
be useful in next_stable. So the results of cherry-picking and
merging would
