Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Matt Sicker
I put the Scala and Kotlin sites inside the log4j site repo mostly because that’s where they used to be in SVN. They could be split out at some point. Matt Sicker > On Oct 19, 2021, at 17:52, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4j-kotlin and log4j-scala could have had their own website repo if Matt >

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Ralph Goers
Log4j-kotlin and log4j-scala could have had their own website repo if Matt had wanted it. You’d have to ask him why he chose not to. No, having the site and source in the same repo is a disaster. First, our website repo is huge as it contains every release of log4j, so doing a git clone would

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Indeed log4jcxx and log4net don't use logging-log4j-site, hence this was a mistake from my side. Yet log4j-kotlin and log4j-scala do. I am not able to see how my point about the difficulty of multi-repo setups is addressed. Log4j sources and the site are on different repos. In conclusion, I am gi

Re: Marker design issue

2021-10-19 Thread Gary Gregory
Thanks for getting back to me Ralph. I'll try the API pattern you provided. Gary On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, 11:33 Ralph Goers wrote: > You are free to put dots in marker names, or any other character for that > matter. > > Markers are created with MarkerManager. Every marker has a unique name and >

Re: Marker design issue

2021-10-19 Thread Ralph Goers
You are free to put dots in marker names, or any other character for that matter. Markers are created with MarkerManager. Every marker has a unique name and can only have one parent. So the way you have expressed the problem below is really incorrect. I really don’t like your example as most p

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Ralph Goers
There are links to all the project web site repos at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGING/Managing+the+Logging+Services+Web+Sites. Ralph > On Oct 19, 2021, at 6:37 AM, Apache wrote: > > Volkan, > > I am not in front of my computer at the moment, but I am 100% sure you are > in

Marker design issue

2021-10-19 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, I get bit by this every time I try to make my markers "fancy" so I took the time this go around to open up a discussion :-) I want markers: Bob.children.John Bob.children.Jimmy Alice.children.Rose Alice.children.Sue (Never mind Alice.chidren.Bob) I want to turn off only "Bob.children" b

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Apache
Volkan, I am not in front of my computer at the moment, but I am 100% sure you are incorrect. Every logging project has its own GitHub repo for its own web site. The thought of having log4cxx and Log4Net use a repo with Log4J in the name doesn’t make any sense. Publishing a web site involves c

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-19 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
I see that you check coverage via jacoco-maven-plugin . Repeating this practice for this module (only?) is fine by me. On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:52 AM Eduard Gizatullin wrote: > Done, https://github.com/apache/log

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
In its current state, all Logging Services projects (log4j, log4jcxx, log4net, etc.) dump their websites to a single repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-site If I need to publish continuous benchmark results of logging-log4j2 repository, I need to push my changes to two other branch

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-19 Thread Eduard Gizatullin
Done, https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/pull/2 The new artifact can be built, I care about one minor thing: whether it is possible to enable code coverage check during a test stage? Original project was configured for 96% threshold for LOC -- Best regards, Ed On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at