+1
Verified the signature and that the LICENSE AND NOTICE were present on the
distribution artifacts. I did no testing.
Ralph
> On Sep 28, 2021, at 1:13 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:37 AM Robert Middleton
> wrote:
>
>> This is a vote to release log4cxx 0.1
+1
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:37 AM Robert Middleton
wrote:
> This is a vote to release log4cxx 0.12.1.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release because...
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours(or more
That sounds like we're in agreement then. I'll go put in a merge
request for that sometime in the next few weeks(against a new
development branch) to track it. My thought is that all of these
new(and breaking changes) will be in a separate branch(log4cxx-next?)
so as to not mess with master, as t
As a reminder, this vote is still outstanding.
-Robert Middleton
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 3:19 AM Thorsten Schöning wrote:
>
> Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
> am Mittwoch, 22. September 2021 um 02:37 schrieben Sie:
>
> > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> >
