Re: Log4j master branch

2021-07-11 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
I would have expected the build to fail (via maven-enforcer-plugin?) when the build is run with a JDK that is not 8. On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 9:30 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > Master no longer needs a toolchain file. It only uses Java 11. It sorta > sounds like you are running with Java 8. > > Ralph >

Re: Log4j master branch

2021-07-11 Thread Matt Sicker
I’ve been making good progress on the bean stuff. Hopefully untangling the annotation processor from the annotations and the service class will help IDE compatibility. As it is, I’ve been running tests from the command line in individual modules as suggested by Ralph. While not ideal, it’s turned o

Re: Log4j master branch

2021-07-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Ah, yes, thank you Ralph, and my mistake: I was not building with Java 11. Eclipse is still messed up but that's a different story... Gary On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 3:30 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > Master no longer needs a toolchain file. It only uses Java 11. It sorta > sounds like you are running wi

Re: Log4j master branch

2021-07-11 Thread Ralph Goers
Master no longer needs a toolchain file. It only uses Java 11. It sorta sounds like you are running with Java 8. Ralph > On Jul 10, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'm exasperated by our build on the master branch; JPMS feels like the > iceberg that will sink Java. > > I can build r