Re: [VOTE] Release log4cxx 0.12.0-RC2

+1 Ralph > On May 8, 2021, at 8:28 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 12:21 PM Stephen Webb wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 1:13 PM Robert Middleton >> wrote: >> >>> As a reminder, this vote is still outstanding. >>> >>> -Robert Middleton >>> >>> On Tue

Re: [VOTE] Release log4cxx 0.12.0-RC2

+1 On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 12:21 PM Stephen Webb wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 1:13 PM Robert Middleton > wrote: > > > As a reminder, this vote is still outstanding. > > > > -Robert Middleton > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Robert Middleton > > wrote: > > > > > > I've updated th

Re: [VOTE] Release log4cxx 0.12.0-RC2

+1 On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 1:13 PM Robert Middleton wrote: > As a reminder, this vote is still outstanding. > > -Robert Middleton > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Robert Middleton > wrote: > > > > I've updated the NOTICE file in git, so it will be correct for the > > next release. :) > > > > O

Re: [VOTE] Release log4cxx 0.12.0-RC2

As a reminder, this vote is still outstanding. -Robert Middleton On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Robert Middleton wrote: > > I've updated the NOTICE file in git, so it will be correct for the > next release. :) > > Otherwise everything still looks good to me, so adding my +1 now. > > -Robert Midd

Re: LOG4J2-3075 Formatting timestamps with nanosecond precision

Do note that the FastDateFormat et al. classes are copied directly from Apache Commons. Most changes done there are relevant to upstream. :) On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 10:14, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to tackle LOG4J2-3075 > rep

Re: Quarterly project status updates - please check in

Thanks for the updates. I've posted a draft report on the private list. On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 14:18, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > I would appreciate some mention on Ralph's two great (if I may say) crusades > : > > 1. Migrating master (aka, 3.x) branch to Java 11 > 2. Implementing features necessitat

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

CI fixed as of https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Logging/job/chainsaw/job/master/16/ now using Java 11 to build. On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 14:41, Robert Middleton wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 8, 2021, 11:19 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > > > > As for committing the repository, > > > > you are a committer and

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

> > On Sat, May 8, 2021, 11:19 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > > > As for committing the repository, > > > you are a committer and can do so. We do commit-then-review here which > > > allows people to asynchronously review changes with lazy consensus. Sounds fine to me - I just didn't want to go and star

Re: [logging-pipelines] branch master updated: Use Java 11 for master branch

I've updated the function to use a tool installation to get the path instead of hard-coding it. I've also updated it to check if it's running in log4j (master) or chainsaw (any branch) to choose a different default jdk. Unfortunately, Jenkins went down for maintenance around the same time I pushed

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

Looks like Jenkins is under maintenance at the moment. Will check if my recent changes fixed that build when it's up again. On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 13:22, Scott Deboy wrote: > > Chainsaw Mac integration leverages java9 features now (Mac prefs menu > integration). I can review merge requests. > > On

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

Chainsaw Mac integration leverages java9 features now (Mac prefs menu integration). I can review merge requests. On Sat, May 8, 2021, 11:19 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > It appears that Chainsaw updated its minimum Java version to 9. I'll > get that fixed in the Jenkins build. As for committing the re

Re: [Chainsaw] Minor fixes

It appears that Chainsaw updated its minimum Java version to 9. I'll get that fixed in the Jenkins build. As for committing the repository, you are a committer and can do so. We do commit-then-review here which allows people to asynchronously review changes with lazy consensus. On Fri, 7 May 2021