Re: [log4cxx] Smart pointer implementation

2021-02-27 Thread Robert Middleton
> > Requiring C++11 also simplifies some code - as you saw, I left in some > > std::shared_ptrs around instead of log4cxx::pointer, but the code that > > detects for C++ wouldn't be needed if we can assume that it already > > exists(some detection code for C++14/17 features would still be > > requi

Re: [log4cxx] Smart pointer implementation

2021-02-27 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Robert Middleton, am Samstag, 27. Februar 2021 um 01:14 schrieben Sie: > I feel that requiring at least C++11 is perfectly reasonable at this > point. The latest release is a good choice for legacy systems, and if > needed we can branch from the last release(or from the current master >