Re: [LOG4NET] Vote for release: 2.0.12

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
Thanks Ralph -d On October 26, 2020 18:48:30 Ralph Goers wrote: The files were added to the distribution directory. Ralph On Oct 26, 2020, at 9:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: OK +1 to these. Ralph On Oct 26, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: Ralph, here's the 2.0.12 thread where Ma

Re: [LOG4NET] Vote for release: 2.0.12

2020-10-26 Thread Ralph Goers
The files were added to the distribution directory. Ralph > On Oct 26, 2020, at 9:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > OK > > +1 to these. > > Ralph > >> On Oct 26, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: >> >> Ralph, here's the 2.0.12 thread where Matt and Remko voted. >> >> -d >> >> >> On Octo

[Announce] [log4net] release 2.0.12

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi all I'd like to announce the release of log4net 2.0.12, which resolves issues LOG4NET-652 AND LOG4NET-653, both of which are related to correctly retrieving the username for the current thread, which would throw an exception on non-win32 platforms. The site is up, nupkg is released, pleas

Re: [LOG4NET] Vote for release: 2.0.12

2020-10-26 Thread Ralph Goers
OK +1 to these. Ralph > On Oct 26, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Ralph, here's the 2.0.12 thread where Matt and Remko voted. > > -d > > > On October 23, 2020 17:57:31 Davyd McColl wrote: > >> Thanks Matt >> >> I think I need 3 to release... Any other takers? >> >> -d >> >>

Re: [LOG4NET] Vote for release: 2.0.12

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
Ralph, here's the 2.0.12 thread where Matt and Remko voted. -d On October 23, 2020 17:57:31 Davyd McColl wrote: Thanks Matt I think I need 3 to release... Any other takers? -d On October 23, 2020 17:33:19 Matt Sicker wrote: It seems I forgot to add my +1 here. On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Ralph Goers
Yeah, now that you point that out the artifact I looked at was the one in the original email in this thread - 2.0.11.zip. I can’t say what everyone else voted on. Ralph > On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:41 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Ralph, I think this thread has been a little confused along the way

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
Ralph, I think this thread has been a little confused along the way -- I see that the title of this mail includes the version 2.0.11, but the current release is 2.0.12, which includes the versioning fix mentioned in this thread, as well as fixes for LOG4NET-(652|653) wherein the username associa

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi Matt Thanks, I still forget some of the dots and crosses ): -d On 2020/10/26 16:20:58, Matt Sicker wrote: Yes, an email confirming the vote passed along with the tally. Then, after everything has been uploaded and mirrored, we can send an announcement email about the release. On Mon, 26 Oct

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Matt Sicker
Yes, an email confirming the vote passed along with the tally. Then, after everything has been uploaded and mirrored, we can send an announcement email about the release. On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 06:58, Davyd McColl wrote: > > By results, I understand you mean a tally? There were only three votes,

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Davyd McColl
By results, I understand you mean a tally? There were only three votes, all positive. I've pushed the nupkg. -d On October 26, 2020 13:35:15 Apache wrote: You need to close the vote thread with the results first before performing the final release steps. Ralph On Oct 25, 2020, at 11:24

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Apache
You need to close the vote thread with the results first before performing the final release steps. Ralph > On Oct 25, 2020, at 11:24 PM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Thanks Ralph > > Could you assist with getting artifacts up to downloads.apache.org? I'm going > to push the nupkg because people