I have found that if I need to get ahold of Matt he is particularly responsive
on Slack ;-). Of course, that may change when he is no longer confined to
quarters.
Ralph
> On May 23, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> The Apache Slack is archived and supported by Infra. It's mainly
> use
The Apache Slack is archived and supported by Infra. It's mainly
useful for interactive things since we still need to use the mailing
list for more general things.
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 16:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that Slack should be considered as temporary storage, since
> you
OK, Matt, sounds good, my workaround was to rename my instance variable...
Gary
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 4:33 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> I think that annotation should be re-added based on some issues I came
> across while working on the revised DI system. And I believe that is a
> bug.
>
> On Sat,
Keep in mind that Slack should be considered as temporary storage, since
you have to pay to access data past some threshold.
Gary
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 4:39 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> FYI - there is a Logging channel in the ASF’s account on Slack. I have
> Slack on all my devices, Matt and I cha
FYI - there is a Logging channel in the ASF’s account on Slack. I have Slack on
all my devices, Matt and I chat there occasionally. If you need something in a
hurry you are more likely to get a quick response there than via email. That
said, nothing that gets discussed there is official - that
I think that annotation should be re-added based on some issues I came
across while working on the revised DI system. And I believe that is a
bug.
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 12:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> The deprecated @PluginBuilderAttribute in master does not seem to use its
> value().
Hi All:
The deprecated @PluginBuilderAttribute in master does not seem to use its
value().
Is that a bug and if not how am I supposed to port a builder that has an
ivar like:
@PluginBuilderAttribute(value = "connection")
@Required(message = "No connection string provided")
Guten Tag Patrick Mills,
am Freitag, 22. Mai 2020 um 23:26 schrieben Sie:
> So my question is which does the log4cxx community prefer? Something that
> minimizes code changes or something that more closely mirrors log4j; the
> filter itself remains pretty much the same either way.
I prefer the le