Building with Java 11 (was Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2)

2020-02-26 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > +1 > > My review is based on the git tag. > > Running 'mvn -V clean package' OK with: > > Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) > Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.3\bin\.. > Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: O

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 My review is based on the git tag. Running 'mvn -V clean package' OK with: Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.3\bin\.. Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_241\jre Default l

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Matt Sicker
* Signatures good * Builds and tests pass * Site looks good +1 On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 13:38, Matt Sicker wrote: > > False alarm; turns out it was only failing while connected to VPN. > Tests pass when using a normal network. > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:46, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > > System in

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Matt Sicker
False alarm; turns out it was only failing while connected to VPN. Tests pass when using a normal network. On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:46, Matt Sicker wrote: > > System info: > > openjdk version "1.8.0_222" > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 1.8.0_222-b10) > OpenJDK 64-

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Matt Sicker
System info: openjdk version "1.8.0_222" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 1.8.0_222-b10) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode) I also tried running it with 11, but I got different errors in the test: openjdk version "11.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Ralph Goers
Yes, our web site is very large. It isn’t required that we distribute it but I always like to. That test failure is not something I have encountered nor seen in the Jenkins builds. Ralph > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Has the site zip always been so large? 331 MB. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.1-rc2

2020-02-26 Thread Matt Sicker
Has the site zip always been so large? 331 MB. I'm getting a recurring test failure for "SocketReconnectTest.testReconnect:151 No Exception thrown" in log4j-core On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 23:38, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > projec

Re: Memory leak with log4j 2.13

2020-02-26 Thread Ralph Goers
Attachments generally do not make it to the mailing lists. There is no leak report attached to the email. I think you are going to have to explain a little more as to what your application was doing that would cause so many Console Appenders. While there is a Default Configuration there is no

Re: Memory leak with log4j 2.13

2020-02-26 Thread Carter Kozak
Hi Srijith, Thanks for reaching out. Could you file a jira issue to track all of this information? If you could attach or link a minimal reproducer that would be tremendously helpful. Thanks, -ck On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, at 07:25, Srijith Kochunni wrote: > Hi All, > > We recently upgraded our

Memory leak with log4j 2.13

2020-02-26 Thread Srijith Kochunni
Hi All, We recently upgraded our application to log4j 2.13 from log4j 1.2.15. Since the upgrade, we've noticed in one of our test setups that the application is running out of heap space. Upon inspecting the heap dump, we found that there are almost a 100 thousand entries in the Ha