Nice write up, a Ralph!
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 14:58, Apache wrote:
>
> I thought you all might be interested in this -
> https://www.ralphgoers.com/home/why-was-log4j-2-created. I plan to write a
> few entries on what is new in Log4J.
>
> Ralph
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Andrew Marlow wrote:
>
> yes Ralph that was great! I was particularly interested to learn that the
> LMAX disruptor came later. I had always assumed async logging was the prime
> motivation.
Thanks,
No. As I recall that was Remko’s addition. I had never heard
yes Ralph that was great! I was particularly interested to learn that the
LMAX disruptor came later. I had always assumed async logging was the prime
motivation.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:58, Apache wrote:
> I thought you all might be interested in this -
> https://www.ralphgoers.com/home/why-wa
Very interesting post! Definitely interested in more.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 13:15, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> That was a pretty good read Ralph, please keep them coming.
> Further I will appreciate if you can share the upcoming
> (Log4j-related?) posts here too.
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:58 AM
That was a pretty good read Ralph, please keep them coming.
Further I will appreciate if you can share the upcoming
(Log4j-related?) posts here too.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:58 AM Apache wrote:
>
> I thought you all might be interested in this -
> https://www.ralphgoers.com/home/why-was-log4j-2
