Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.0-rc1

2019-12-10 Thread Ralph Goers
I just noticed that Jenkins also has a unit test failing in log4j-1.2-api. Ralph > On Dec 10, 2019, at 8:06 AM, Carter Kozak wrote: > > I'm planning to test and benchmark with several projects I'm responsible for > today. > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, at 10:03, Ralph Goers wrote: >> Thanks Gary,

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.0-rc1

2019-12-10 Thread Carter Kozak
I'm planning to test and benchmark with several projects I'm responsible for today. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, at 10:03, Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks Gary, although it would have been nice to have had feedback on the > failing unit test in the 4 months since it has been in place instead of > waiting

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.0-rc1

2019-12-10 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks Gary, although it would have been nice to have had feedback on the failing unit test in the 4 months since it has been in place instead of waiting until after the release vote to test it. Are any other PMC members planning on voting on the release or do I need to create another release c

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.13.0-rc1

2019-12-10 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm not OK with that kind of workaround, as a user it does not inspire confidence. I won't -1 though. Gary On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:21 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > So add @Ignore to that one test. > > Ralph > > > On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > The problem is that it pr