I don’t understand. You can’t add javax.inject stuff into our namespace without
changing the package name. And if you change the package name I don’t see any
benefit at all as the current names are much clearer.
I have no problem with Configurations being a plugin except it will currently
cause
I'm thinking that the old annotations can be supported in terms of the
javax.inject API. As for requiring a jar, that's why I've also
suggested just adopting the annotations into our own package
somewhere.
Either way this is done, my general goal is to untangle other areas in
the core API that cou
I don’t see how that relates. The proposal as I understand it is to replace the
existing annotations with annotations from javax.inject, which would require a
JEE jar.
Ralph
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:26 PM Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>>
>>
I also don’t think it is a good idea for other reasons:
1. The annotations you are reeferencing a s replacements for the current ones
seem to be a stretch. For example it isn’t clear to me why @Qualifier has
anything to do with @PluginAttribute. It just seems far more confusing.
2. You would stil
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:26 PM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> IIUC this will require a dependency on a Java EE jar? For that reason alone,
> no.
Don't think so. A simple (mostly JSR 330 compliant) provider can be
implemented in a few classes:
https://github.com/jochenw/afw/tree/master/afw-core/src/ma
IIUC this will require a dependency on a Java EE jar? For that reason alone,
no.
Ralph
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> That sounds good Matt, I say go for it.
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 16:08 Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> I've been doing some experiments with the pl
That sounds good Matt, I say go for it.
Gary
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 16:08 Matt Sicker wrote:
> I've been doing some experiments with the plugin system for 3.x
> lately, and I've recently pushed some changes toward that end. One of
> the insights I gained from it was that some of our plugin annota
I've been doing some experiments with the plugin system for 3.x
lately, and I've recently pushed some changes toward that end. One of
the insights I gained from it was that some of our plugin annotations
were redundant (result: @PluginBuilderFactory merged into
@PluginFactory; @PluginBuilderAttribu
