Re: Travis

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
Ok, fixed for real now: https://travis-ci.org/apache/logging-log4j2/builds/580008415 On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 17:00, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I think I've got it working now. See > https://travis-ci.org/apache/logging-log4j2/builds/579990414 for the > specific run. > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Mat

Fwd: [logging-log4j2] branch release-2.x updated: Add jdk8 to toolchain

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
For some reason, the Reply-To address is being ignored by Gmail for this message. Anyways, I can't figure out which combination of JDKs to use for release-2.x. The closest combo I found to work was jdk8+jdk11, but then there was a unit test failure in the YAML config which is likely related to jdk7

Re: Travis

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
I think I've got it working now. See https://travis-ci.org/apache/logging-log4j2/builds/579990414 for the specific run. On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Ok, I'm getting annoyed from all the build failure emails from Travis. > I'm looking into fixing this now. > > On Thu, 1 Aug

Re: Travis

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
Ok, I'm getting annoyed from all the build failure emails from Travis. I'm looking into fixing this now. On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 13:32, Matt Sicker wrote: > > If their documentation is wrong, there are probably two options: > > 1. Run find . in a job and look through the file system. > 2. Use the a

Fwd: svn commit: r1866249 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/resolved.mdtext

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Sicker
Based on this clarification, we do not need to remove the maven wrapper jar from our source distributions. I brought this up in the last release vote, so I'm noting here that it's no longer an issue. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 21:56 Subject: svn commit: