Well, I can infer it from the examples but it doesn’t come close to explaining
some of the things we use it for. I would argue that logging a line whose value
changes on every call, even if it is just an incremented integer, that writes
to a file is more than a micro-benchmark, and I truly want
The JMH samples
(https://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/tip/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/)
are the best place to learn about the pitfalls of java micro benchmarks and
how JMH can help you avoid them.
Remko.
(Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http:
I don’t understand what you mean with you last message.
I don’t really know the details of how JMH works but my understanding is it
does something to prevent things like dead code elimination. I haven’t been
able to find anything very specific about what JMH actually does though.
Ralph
> On Ju
And the checkpoint bias thing is alleviated amongst other noise from the
JVM that would otherwise invalidate the time measurements.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 13:14, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I thought JMH ran your code enough for JIT to take effect (though that’s
> also up to your warmup iteration setti
I thought JMH ran your code enough for JIT to take effect (though that’s
also up to your warmup iteration setting), and the
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 00:21, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> That said, here are the results of the FileAppenderWithLocationBenchmark
> from master.
>
> Benchmark
