On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 18:16, Remko Popma wrote:
> About Ralph’s concern, would it not be possible for the DSL to create actual
> Appender and Layout objects? What prevents us from doing this?
Nothing in particular. I just found it to be out of the scope of what
I was proposing. It might turn out
I like the first syntax with the map-like API.
About Ralph’s concern, would it not be possible for the DSL to create actual
Appender and Layout objects? What prevents us from doing this?
Remko
> On May 4, 2019, at 3:25, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Second example was a typo it looks like.
>
> On
Second example was a typo it looks like.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:57, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> My only concern is that people might be expecting a DSL to create the
> actual Appenders, Layouts, etc. where this will just be creating
> configuration Nodes. That said, I don’t have a problem with it. I
My only concern is that people might be expecting a DSL to create the actual
Appenders, Layouts, etc. where this will just be creating configuration Nodes.
That said, I don’t have a problem with it. I am not sure that your second
example is valid since you are declaring an appender without an ap
I don’t understand. We already support JSON.
Ralph
> On May 3, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I am all for making configurations easier to author. Your examples are less
> verbose than XML which is nice. I wonder if the same config would also look
> nice in JSON.
>
> Gary (on my ph
I am all for making configurations easier to author. Your examples are less
verbose than XML which is nice. I wonder if the same config would also look
nice in JSON.
Gary (on my phone ATM)
On Fri, May 3, 2019, 13:08 Matt Sicker wrote:
> I believe Ralph has brought up a feature request in the pa
I believe Ralph has brought up a feature request in the past, though I
don't remember where. Anyways, Logback has a Groovy DSL [1] as an
option to configure itself, and we could introduce a similar feature
built on top of the existing ConfigurationBuilder code from the Java
DSL in log4j-core. After
