Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.1 RC1

Vote: +1 No problems encountered so far with this RC for my team’s project. Code for reference: https://github.com/jenkinsci/audit-log-plugin David

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

Red-green color blindness is fairly common as well :-) On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 5:10 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:28, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > 2.x is blue (why not green Jenkins? why?) > > > > From Wikipedia: > Japanese traffic signals mostly follow the same rule except t

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:28, Gary Gregory wrote: > 2.x is blue (why not green Jenkins? why?) > >From Wikipedia: Japanese traffic signals mostly follow the same rule except that the "go" signals are referred to as 青 (blue

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:21 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > 2.x is blue (why not green Jenkins? why?) > https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Logging/job/Log4j%202%202.x/ I'll look at 3.x... Gary > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:46 AM Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> I am really waiting for confirmatio

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

2.x is blue (why not green Jenkins? why?) On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:46 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > I am really waiting for confirmation that the fix for LOG4J2-1906 is > working correctly. You initially had an error on Windows but it sounds like > it went away. Jenkins failed once on it but has

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

Yeah, I installed it in VMWare Fusion. Windows 10 didn’t run well at all in VirtualBox on my laptop. However, I didn’t pay for a license and don’t intend to so it will expire after 3 months. As I recall that won’t cripple anything though. Ralph > On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:16 PM, Matt Sicker wrote

Google Summer of Code 2019

We haven't participated with GSoC at Logging yet, but each year, GSoC provides funding for students to get paid to work on an open source project full time (like an internship). Apache is one of the organizations that typically participates. I've been mentoring a couple people in a similar program

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

Speaking of Windows, I recently installed Parallels for testing things in Windows (generally Windows-specific bugs), so going forward, I'll try to verify our releases in multiple operating systems. On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 12:46, Ralph Goers wrote: > I am really waiting for confirmation that the fi

Re: What's left for 2.11.2?

I am really waiting for confirmation that the fix for LOG4J2-1906 is working correctly. You initially had an error on Windows but it sounds like it went away. Jenkins failed once on it but hasn’t failed since. The report of LOG4J2-2517 is related but since I can’t reproduce that it isn’t a block

What's left for 2.11.2?

Hi All: What are the pending issues left we want for 2.11.2? Gary

Re: [4/4] httpcomponents-core git commit: Added openjdk10 to Travis-CI build matrix

Dang it! :-) Thanks Matt! Gary On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:36 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > Yes, we probably could, though if you want HC to know, you should email > them, too. ;) > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 10:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > I think we can skip Java 9 and 10 and instead test Java 11. > >

Re: [4/4] httpcomponents-core git commit: Added openjdk10 to Travis-CI build matrix

Yes, we probably could, though if you want HC to know, you should email them, too. ;) On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 10:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > I think we can skip Java 9 and 10 and instead test Java 11. > > Gary > > -- Forwarded message - > From: > Date: Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:53 AM >

Fwd: [4/4] httpcomponents-core git commit: Added openjdk10 to Travis-CI build matrix

I think we can skip Java 9 and 10 and instead test Java 11. Gary -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:53 AM Subject: [4/4] httpcomponents-core git commit: Added openjdk10 to Travis-CI build matrix To: Added openjdk10 to Travis-CI build matrix Project: htt