Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I’m OK with that, assuming I can remember which one it was. Ralph > On Jun 17, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > About the logo: I would prefer that everywhere we use it we stick to the > Log4j 2 logo as it was designed and not change the colors or pattern any > more. > > The origina

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Remko Popma
About the logo: I would prefer that everywhere we use it we stick to the Log4j 2 logo as it was designed and not change the colors or pattern any more. The original looks much more clean and professional. > On Jun 18, 2018, at 2:06, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Thanks Matt! > > Any help you want

Re: [log4net] crafting the next release

2018-06-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
Am Fr., 15. Juni 2018 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stefan Bodewig < bode...@apache.org>: > On 2018-06-13, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > > That is possible. I restricted access to the github token to the log4net > > build job only. Stefan, would you like to try whether you can gain access > > to that token? I

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Ralph Goers
This vote passes with +1 votes from Remko Popma, Ralph Goers and Matt Sicker. I will continue with the release process, including tying it into the logging web site. Ralph

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks Matt! Any help you want to provide would of course be welcome! If you have ideas on how to improve the documentation please go for it! As for the Log4j logo, I didn’t see any reason not to use it and didn’t really want to spend the time creating a new one. Ralph > On Jun 17, 2018, at 9

Re: Reminder - [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Matt Sicker
Added my vote. Apologies for not getting to this sooner. I should've brought an extra laptop with me on the trip. On 17 June 2018 at 10:31, Matt Sicker wrote: > I’m back home now and will review this today. > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 08:59, Apache wrote: > >> Today this vote will have been ope

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 Notes: * The git checkout command only worked for me without the "tags/" prefix to the tag name, not sure why. * If you change the wget command to use --cut-dirs=5, you can use the same command with the dist.a.o URL, pretty handy for verifying the artifacts * I recently discovered you can use

Re: Reminder - [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Matt Sicker
I’m back home now and will review this today. On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 08:59, Apache wrote: > Today this vote will have been open 1 week. I would ask that you please > find the time to review it and vote. > > Ralph > > > On Jun 15, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Good points. > >

Re: Reminder - [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Apache
Today this vote will have been open 1 week. I would ask that you please find the time to review it and vote. Ralph > On Jun 15, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Good points. > > I see use cases for audit logging in at least two of my products at work, > so I have no doubts as to the