Good points.
I see use cases for audit logging in at least two of my products at work,
so I have no doubts as to the usefulness of this project.
Gary
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:10 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> The only criteria I am aware of for voting for a release is that it has
> the proper notice
The only criteria I am aware of for voting for a release is that it has the
proper notice and license files and is properly signed. AFAIK nothing says it
has to actually build. That said, voting on such a release would be stupid.
Obviously, I would like others to use (and support) the project o
Ralph,
I kind of feel bad just VOTing by running through the build motions and not
having an application to actually test. That would just mean that I can
build the software and look at reports.
Do you feel comfortable with this kind of VOTE?
Gary
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:08 PM Ralph Goers
wr
This vote has now been open 5 days and needs one more +1 vote from a PMC
member. Again, votes from everyone are welcome.
Ralph
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Thanks Matt. Gary replied that he had started reviewing it 2 days OK.
> Mikael’s vote also would count on this
On 2018-06-13, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> That is possible. I restricted access to the github token to the log4net
> build job only. Stefan, would you like to try whether you can gain access
> to that token? I can guide you to where you can find it off-list.
Sorry, still travelling. Even if I don't
