+1
(Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 9:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I started reading the site, which is good so far... should be able to
> continue tomorrow...
>
> Gary
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 17:35 Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> 48 ho
I started reading the site, which is good so far... should be able to
continue tomorrow...
Gary
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 17:35 Ralph Goers wrote:
> 48 hours have passed with no votes or discussion.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a vote to release
48 hours have passed with no votes or discussion.
Ralph
> On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j-Audit 1.0.0, the first release of the Log4j
> Audit project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, rele
That's an interesting question to ask. As I see it, ci should produce good
and final artifacts. This means that ci should also sign them in the
pipeline. We can inject required keys and credentials with secret variables
to make it work. These credentials are then only accessible to whoever has
acce
I think it does. That's the plan, anyways. Not sure when the great Java 8
migration will begin, though.
On 12 June 2018 at 12:35, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Doesn’t master require Java 8 anyway?
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > They don't appear to have Java 7
Doesn’t master require Java 8 anyway?
Ralph
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> They don't appear to have Java 7 installed anymore or at least not
> available in the usual location. A hybrid Java 8/10 build setup would be
> good enough IMO.
>
> --
> Matt Sicker
Most of the release can be done by anybody but a few steps require that you be
a PMC member.
I’m still busy at work but not completely underwater. I need to take a look at
some of the outstanding issues I would like to have fixed and see if I can
knock some out quickly. I also promised to look
They don't appear to have Java 7 installed anymore or at least not
available in the usual location. A hybrid Java 8/10 build setup would be
good enough IMO.
--
Matt Sicker
Will you be signing and uploading them locally or via Jenkins?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:05, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our CI is ready to supply us with binaries along with the log4net
> website. This will be the first time that binaries from the CI are
> shipped as a release. Therefore
The earlier the better ;-) We need an RM to volunteer, that's been Ralph in
the past mostly.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM Carter Kozak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do we have a release schedule for 2.11.1? I'm more than happy to
> assist with the process.
>
> Best,
> -ck
>
Hi all,
Do we have a release schedule for 2.11.1? I'm more than happy to
assist with the process.
Best,
-ck
Hi,
our CI is ready to supply us with binaries along with the log4net
website. This will be the first time that binaries from the CI are
shipped as a release. Therefore we seek out for volunteers who evaluate
the CI binaries [1]. Doing so is a great help and allows us to take the
next steps o
12 matches
Mail list logo