> On May 9, 2018, at 14:29, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Here is the problem I see. You view the Jira issue as a simple question. I
> agree simple questions do not belong in Jira. However, this was marked as a
> bug report because they are having problems getting logs into Splunk. I don’t
> view th
> On May 9, 2018, at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It's a distinction we make over at Commons IIRC.
I hope for the sake of the users that the Commons website documents this
requirement then. :-)
>
> Gary
>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>
>>
>> We have not made cl
Thanks for this re-review. While I am going to go through this and make some
changes, my basic question would be is if any of this would make you vote -1 on
a release candidate? While I think the documentation should be good I don’t
think it has to be perfect.
Although I have been using it in
Here is the problem I see. You view the Jira issue as a simple question. I
agree simple questions do not belong in Jira. However, this was marked as a bug
report because they are having problems getting logs into Splunk. I don’t view
this as a simple question but as a request to solve their prob
It's a distinction we make over at Commons IIRC.
Gary
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> We have not made clear to users (on our website or anywhere) that they are
> expected to use the mailing list for some types of communications and JIRA
> for other communications. If th
We have not made clear to users (on our website or anywhere) that they are
expected to use the mailing list for some types of communications and JIRA for
other communications. If that’s ignorance then I’m ignorant too.
We have no rule that I’m aware of that questions cannot be asked on JIRA bu
I think that is a wrong view of how to use Jira. I imagine that people post
to Jira either out of ignorance, or for not wanting to subscribe to a
mailing list before posting.
I see Jira first as a bug tracking system and second as a project
management tool. Using Jira to answer user queries will j
Gary, why did you close that ticket?
This is a valid technical question about log4j 2, and I see absolutely nothing
wrong with using the log4j 2 JIRA for it. The JIRA notifications are captured
on the mailing list, fulfilling the Apache requirements.
Our web site gives no indication whatsoeve
+1 :-)
I only have very limited time frames available to hack on log4net but am
happy to help wherever help is needed.
For instance we have to fix the build pipeline to have something to rely on
and allow contributions to be sanity checked by tests.
On 8 May 2018 5:05 p.m., "Matt Sicker" wrote:
Please feel free! Our bandwidth for log4net is a bit less since there are
less developers here familiar with C#, but we love contributions. :)
On 7 May 2018 at 17:52, William Davis wrote:
> I gotcha, if there is interest Id like to get a pr started.
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018, 1:25 PM Matt Sicker
I already complained about this back when the spec was released. OSGi is
apparently a professional organization more so than a standards one, so
only paying members get to set standards. Apache does not pay for
membership to such organizations, though there are many PMCs with
developers in said org
Hi Ralph,
**JDK 11 EA build 12 , *under both the GPL and Oracle EA licenses,
is now available at **http://jdk.java.net/11**. **
*
* Newly approved Schedule, status & features
o http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/
* Release Notes:
o http://jdk.java.net/11/release-notes
*
12 matches
Mail list logo