Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Remko Popma
> On May 9, 2018, at 14:29, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Here is the problem I see. You view the Jira issue as a simple question. I > agree simple questions do not belong in Jira. However, this was marked as a > bug report because they are having problems getting logs into Splunk. I don’t > view th

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Remko Popma
> On May 9, 2018, at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote: > > It's a distinction we make over at Commons IIRC. I hope for the sake of the users that the Commons website documents this requirement then. :-) > > Gary > >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Remko Popma wrote: >> >> >> We have not made cl

Re: Log4j-audit release

2018-05-08 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks for this re-review. While I am going to go through this and make some changes, my basic question would be is if any of this would make you vote -1 on a release candidate? While I think the documentation should be good I don’t think it has to be perfect. Although I have been using it in

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Ralph Goers
Here is the problem I see. You view the Jira issue as a simple question. I agree simple questions do not belong in Jira. However, this was marked as a bug report because they are having problems getting logs into Splunk. I don’t view this as a simple question but as a request to solve their prob

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
It's a distinction we make over at Commons IIRC. Gary On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > We have not made clear to users (on our website or anywhere) that they are > expected to use the mailing list for some types of communications and JIRA > for other communications. If th

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Remko Popma
We have not made clear to users (on our website or anywhere) that they are expected to use the mailing list for some types of communications and JIRA for other communications. If that’s ignorance then I’m ignorant too. We have no rule that I’m aware of that questions cannot be asked on JIRA bu

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
I think that is a wrong view of how to use Jira. I imagine that people post to Jira either out of ignorance, or for not wanting to subscribe to a mailing list before posting. I see Jira first as a bug tracking system and second as a project management tool. Using Jira to answer user queries will j

Re: [jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-2337) JSONLayout printing \r at end of line

2018-05-08 Thread Remko Popma
Gary, why did you close that ticket? This is a valid technical question about log4j 2, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with using the log4j 2 JIRA for it. The JIRA notifications are captured on the mailing list, fulfilling the Apache requirements. Our web site gives no indication whatsoeve

Re: Async Appenders

2018-05-08 Thread Dominik Psenner
+1 :-) I only have very limited time frames available to hack on log4net but am happy to help wherever help is needed. For instance we have to fix the build pipeline to have something to rely on and allow contributions to be sanity checked by tests. On 8 May 2018 5:05 p.m., "Matt Sicker" wrote:

Re: Async Appenders

2018-05-08 Thread Matt Sicker
Please feel free! Our bandwidth for log4net is a bit less since there are less developers here familiar with C#, but we love contributions. :) On 7 May 2018 at 17:52, William Davis wrote: > I gotcha, if there is interest Id like to get a pr started. > > On Mon, May 7, 2018, 1:25 PM Matt Sicker

Re: Log4j and OSGi

2018-05-08 Thread Matt Sicker
I already complained about this back when the spec was released. OSGi is apparently a professional organization more so than a standards one, so only paying members get to set standards. Apache does not pay for membership to such organizations, though there are many PMCs with developers in said org

JDK 11 Early Access build 12 available

2018-05-08 Thread Rory O'Donnell
Hi Ralph, **JDK 11 EA build 12 , *under both the GPL and Oracle EA licenses, is now available at **http://jdk.java.net/11**. ** * * Newly approved Schedule, status & features o http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/ * Release Notes: o http://jdk.java.net/11/release-notes *