+1
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Good point on the clarification. I said all git repos, and that actually
> entails:
>
> * chainsaw
> * log4cxx
> * log4j2 and all its repos
> * log4net
> * log4php
> * parent pom
>
> In fact, the only repos this doesn't cover are the old l
It certainly sounds like a good idea. As for sub prefixes, that's an
interesting question because there would be Apache trademark issues there
potentially, though I'm not entirely sure about that and would need to
investigate further.
On 28 April 2018 at 00:27, Sean Rose wrote:
> Now that NuGet
Good point on the clarification. I said all git repos, and that actually
entails:
* chainsaw
* log4cxx
* log4j2 and all its repos
* log4net
* log4php
* parent pom
In fact, the only repos this doesn't cover are the old log4j 1 svn repos
that we have.
On 29 April 2018 at 05:08, Dominik Psenner wr
+1
Also for the log4net repository.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 23:59 Remko Popma, wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > > This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us inf
