I hope any site issues can be addressed post release since I know RCs are
time consuming...
Gary
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> +1
>
> checksums good, site looks good (other than the issues already pointed out
> by others)
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Ralph Goers
+1
checksums good, site looks good (other than the issues already pointed out
by others)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.11.0, the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developer
