On 31 October 2017 at 16:06, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
>
> Maybe Logstash and Graylog should be refered to as "products" rather than
> "projects".
>
Makes sense.
> And since Logstash doesn't really provide the desired functionallity by
> itself, maybe refer to the "ELK stack" instead.
Also makes
Nice!
Maybe Logstash and Graylog should be refered to as "products" rather
than "projects".
And since Logstash doesn't really provide the desired functionallity by
itself, maybe refer to the "ELK stack" instead.
On 2017-10-30 19:09, Matt Sicker wrote:
In preparation for an upcoming talk I
