[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-538) AdoNetAppender to PostgreSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16148498#comment-16148498 ] Simon Evieux commented on LOG4NET-538: -- As far as I can see, not in version 2.0.8...

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.9.0 released

Blogged: https://blogs.apache.org/logging/entry/log4j-2-9-released (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info > On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:26, Ralph Goers wrote: > > The Apache Log4j 2 team is pleased to announce the Log4j 2.9.0 release! > > Apache Log4j is a well known

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.9.0 released

The Apache Log4j 2 team is pleased to announce the Log4j 2.9.0 release! Apache Log4j is a well known framework for logging application behavior. Log4j 2 is an upgrade to Log4j that provides significant improvements over its predecessor, Log4j 1.x, and provides many other modern features such as

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.9.0-rc1

Thanks for the reminder. I will do it momentarily. Ralph > On Aug 30, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I drafted a Log4j 2.9 release blog post. > I'll hold off on publishing until the announcement email. Roughly what time > do you think you'll send it, Ralph? > > Remko > >> On Aug

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.9.0-rc1

I drafted a Log4j 2.9 release blog post. I'll hold off on publishing until the announcement email. Roughly what time do you think you'll send it, Ralph? Remko > On Aug 30, 2017, at 14:43, Ralph Goers wrote: > > The vote to release Log4j 2.9.0 based on release candidate 1 has passed with > +

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.0-rc1

Please create a Jira issue for this. It should be a simple matter to catch the exception and ignore it. Ralph > On Aug 30, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Leon Finker wrote: > > Hi, > > Tested with two large legacy projects. The only issue found due to xerces > 2.6.2 version being pulled in in one app and

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.0-rc1

Hi, Tested with two large legacy projects. The only issue found due to xerces 2.6.2 version being pulled in in one app and then causing log4j2 failure to initialize (changes are from LOG4J2-1959). I guess we may have to try and upgrade xerces to latest due to this. Exception in thread "main" java

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (INFRA-14645) node requirements for jenkins job logging-log4net

I have no information about who uses log4net and against which framework it runs. It would be great to have this information. There is this: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=6523 {quote} Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable Package (x64) [...] *Supported Op

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-573) Appenders Deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16147792#comment-16147792 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-573: - Hi Michal. There's a lot going on in

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (INFRA-14645) node requirements for jenkins job logging-log4net

For what it is worth, if you go to https://repository.apache.org/#central-stat you can see that about 25% of the downloads for log4j-api are for versions that still support Java 6. Unfortunately, I don’t know of any way to detect how many users are s

Re: Module log4j-core-its not in MC

We publish unit test jars. Those contain test classes with some value for testing end user applications. Ralph > On Aug 30, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20a%3A%22log4j-api%22 > https://search.mave

Re: Module log4j-core-its not in MC

Yes, I manually deleted that before publishing to central. I can’t think of any reason why anyone would need that as a dependency. The release process used to manually delete several other modules but I modified the poms to have the deploy goal be ignored. Apparently I missed core-its. That will

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (INFRA-14645) node requirements for jenkins job logging-log4net

Oh well, so much for that idea. Do you think net-2.0 is still in wide enough use to continue supporting it? We moved on from Java 6 to 7 as baseline requirements for Log4j a while back even though there are still stragglers using 6, though the idea there is that most users still on 6 aren't really

Re: Module log4j-core-its not in MC

https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20a%3A%22log4j-api%22 https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.logging.log4j%22%20AND%20a%3A%22log4j-core%22 So it looks like we do have a history of publishing unit test jars. I think you h

Re: Module log4j-core-its not in MC

But I think that is a _good_ thing to have all modules published. Gary On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I was the one who published 2.8.2, and I think I simply forgot to delete > that from the staging repo before releasing. > > On 30 August 2017 at 09:46, Gary Gregory wrot

Re: Module log4j-core-its not in MC

I was the one who published 2.8.2, and I think I simply forgot to delete that from the staging repo before releasing. On 30 August 2017 at 09:46, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > My build is going fine with 2.9.0 from MC but I do not see the > log4j-core-its in MC: > > https://search.maven.org/

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1906) DirectWriteRolloverStrategy not properly creating files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16147401#comment-16147401 ] Antonio Tarricone edited comment on LOG4J2-1906 at 8/30/17 3:12 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1906) DirectWriteRolloverStrategy not properly creating files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16147401#comment-16147401 ] Antonio Tarricone commented on LOG4J2-1906: --- I've the same trouble. Below log4

Module log4j-core-its not in MC

Hi All, My build is going fine with 2.9.0 from MC but I do not see the log4j-core-its in MC: https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22log4j-core-its%22 Shouldn't it be there? Gary

[jira] [Created] (LOG4NET-573) Appenders Deadlock

Michal created LOG4NET-573: -- Summary: Appenders Deadlock Key: LOG4NET-573 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-573 Project: Log4net Issue Type: Bug Components: Appenders

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.0-rc1

If anyone has a script for recursively checking the checksums of a directory tree I'd be much obliged. (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info > On Aug 30, 2017, at 14:36, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Here is my +1 > > Ralph > >> On Aug 26, 2017, at 7:45 PM, Ralph G

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (INFRA-14645) node requirements for jenkins job logging-log4net

On 2017-08-29 16:12, Matt Sicker wrote: I'm not too familiar with this area, but would using Windows containers (e.g., via Docker or similar) work here? Or would that only support newer versions of .net anyways? Good idea Matt, unfortunately net-2.0 is not available in a windows server docker