[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16057043#comment-16057043 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1699: -- The test feels brittle sadly but Jenkins pas

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16057011#comment-16057011 ] Pierrick HYMBERT commented on LOG4J2-1699: -- Thank you Gary for effort to integra

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056881#comment-16056881 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1699: -- I tweaked the test fixture a bit and now the

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056832#comment-16056832 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1699: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056828#comment-16056828 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1699: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056820#comment-16056820 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1699: -- Yes, I ran the tests on Windows 10 from both

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056655#comment-16056655 ] Gary Gregory edited comment on LOG4J2-1699 at 6/21/17 1:50 AM:

Re: New Java 9 module and build

Well, the Eclipse Java 9 support is at the Beta level, so I'll leave it to growing pains... Gary On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > There shouldn’t be anything circular. If there was Maven should have > caught it. Java9 needs to build first and then log4j-api unzips java9 and

Re: NPE in LogManager.

I fixed the NPE, now you just get the "real" exception: ERROR StatusLogger Cannot start ShutdownCallbackRegistry, already shutting down. ERROR StatusLogger Unable to create class org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory specified in provider URL null java.lang.IllegalStateException:

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056729#comment-16056729 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1699: - Commit

Jenkins build is back to stable : Log4j 2.x #2812

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: Log4j 2.x #2811

See

Re: [jira] [Reopened] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

And here I thought Posix file permissions were specific to Unix systems… But if the patch only works on Windows I am wondering if it should be included. Ralph > On Jun 20, 2017, at 4:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > and of course, it passes on my Windows box... Must be OS-specific. Maybe we > s

Re: [jira] [Reopened] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

and of course, it passes on my Windows box... Must be OS-specific. Maybe we should mark this test with a JUnit Assume such that it only runs on Windows for now? Gary On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Ralph Goers (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page= > c

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056655#comment-16056655 ] Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-1699 at 6/20/17 11:22 PM:

[jira] [Reopened] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers reopened LOG4J2-1699: - The Jenkins build now has a unit test failing. org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but was:

Jenkins build is still unstable: Log4j 2.x #2810

See

Jenkins build became unstable: Log4j 2.x #2809

See

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory resolved LOG4J2-1699. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.9 Patch applied with some minor tweaks. Thank you! P

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16056508#comment-16056508 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1699: - Commit

Re: File based appenders as subclasses of AbstractOutputStreamAppender

Hi Gary, Yes it was painful copy paste activity part of this patch, would be great to do so. Le mar. 20 juin 2017 23:54, Ralph Goers a écrit : > If it actually accomplishes something I have no problem with it. My > preference would be to focus on fixing reported issues that we know are > proble

Re: File based appenders as subclasses of AbstractOutputStreamAppender

If it actually accomplishes something I have no problem with it. My preference would be to focus on fixing reported issues that we know are problems. Ralph > On Jun 20, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699

File based appenders as subclasses of AbstractOutputStreamAppender

Hi, Looking at the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699 made me realize that we have five (5) file-based appenders as subclasses of *AbstractOutputStreamAppender*. Any thought for or against creating a new class *AbstractFileAppender* to reduce duplication in all these subc

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierrick HYMBERT updated LOG4J2-1699: - Attachment: LOG4J2-1699.patch > Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermissio

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierrick HYMBERT updated LOG4J2-1699: - Attachment: (was: LOG4J2-1699.patch) > Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFi

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1699) Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierrick HYMBERT updated LOG4J2-1699: - Attachment: LOG4J2-1699.patch Hello Team, I have tried to implement posix user, group an

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-568) Would be nice to avoid accessing the Thread.CurrentPrincipal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055990#comment-16055990 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-568: - Since resolving the identity has a per

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-568) Would be nice to avoid accessing the Thread.CurrentPrincipal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055946#comment-16055946 ] Lehel Bara commented on LOG4NET-568: When you explicitly call the SetThreadPrincipal

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-568) Would be nice to avoid accessing the Thread.CurrentPrincipal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055859#comment-16055859 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-568: - If nobody should access Thread.Current

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1946) DefaultRolloverStrategy is failing if some log file is deleted from the current sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055817#comment-16055817 ] Lucio Farinosi edited comment on LOG4J2-1946 at 6/20/17 2:12 PM: --

Re: NPE in LogManager.

Doesn't sound too serious. Probably had the process killed before it fully shut down. On 19 June 2017 at 21:53, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I just saw this go by with a local build: > > [INFO] Running org.apache.logging.log4j.core.Log4j1222Test > [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1946) DefaultRolloverStrategy is failing if some log file is deleted from the current sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lucio Farinosi updated LOG4J2-1946: --- Attachment: Fixed_ascendingPurge.java > DefaultRolloverStrategy is failing if some log file i

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1946) DefaultRolloverStrategy is failing if some log file is deleted from the current sequence

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055817#comment-16055817 ] Lucio Farinosi commented on LOG4J2-1946: I meant log4j 1.2 performed by default t

[jira] [Created] (LOG4NET-568) Would be nice to avoid accessing the Thread.CurrentPrincipal

Lehel Bara created LOG4NET-568: -- Summary: Would be nice to avoid accessing the Thread.CurrentPrincipal Key: LOG4NET-568 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-568 Project: Log4net I

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1883) Timestamp does not seem to support microseconds level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055753#comment-16055753 ] Anthony Maire commented on LOG4J2-1883: --- I made a first draft here : https://githu

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1766) Distinguish between partial and completed .gz archive file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierrick HYMBERT updated LOG4J2-1766: - Attachment: LOG4J2-1766.patch Hello [~garydgregory], [~ralph.go...@dslextreme.com], I ha

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1910) On changing of log4j2.xml, the CustomConfig and Factory are not called and custom loggers are lost

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055395#comment-16055395 ] Pierrick HYMBERT commented on LOG4J2-1910: -- You may register a {{org.apache.log

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1944) Should suppress message "ERROR No log4j2 configuration file found..." when programmatic API is used to config log4j.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055313#comment-16055313 ] Pierrick HYMBERT commented on LOG4J2-1944: -- Can you please describe how your are

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1947) using mvn install to the project log4j2 causes build failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16055240#comment-16055240 ] zhangcai commented on LOG4J2-1947: -- after i installed java 9 it failed still .how odd.