[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042303#comment-16042303
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1675:
-
Are we going to do anything with this or shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042302#comment-16042302
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1727:
-
Log4j documents that it must be shutdown last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042300#comment-16042300
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1745:
-
I tried using multi-release jars and ran into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042299#comment-16042299
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1746:
-
I don't think we need this any more.
> Add JD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042297#comment-16042297
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1793:
-
Is there anything to do on this or can it be c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1794:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Programmatic reconfiguration doesn't affect existing loggers
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1798:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> InterruptedException on RollingFileManager#rollover()
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1925:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Having log4j-core on the compile classpath somehow breaks compilatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1906:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> DirectWriteRolloverStrategy not properly creating files
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1916:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Nullpointer with DirectWriteRolloverStrategy
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1894:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Potential data race in ReconfigurationDeadlockTest
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1928:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> RollingRandomAccessFileAppender with DirectWriteRolloverStrategy req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042293#comment-16042293
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1894:
-
There is a race here but it is accounted for b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042285#comment-16042285
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1729:
-
Can you validate that this still happens with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reassigned LOG4J2-1828:
---
Assignee: Ralph Goers
> add support for prudent mode in Log4j 2
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042254#comment-16042254
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1841:
-
As I suggested in LOG4J2-248, this behavior sh
Is it possible to use a FallbackAppender to fall back to a recreated
version of itself? If not, perhaps a sort of RecoverableAppender wrapper or
something may be useful.
On 7 June 2017 at 07:41, Apache wrote:
> The reason managers were split from the appender sis because appender are
> recreated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16041816#comment-16041816
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1934:
-
As a workaround, can't you use a failover brok
The reason managers were split from the appender sis because appender are
recreated during reconfiguration while managers are reused.
Ralph
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> I've completed all the clean ups I think were needed in the
> GenericMapMessageSimple b
Hi,
I just did a fresh clone of the log4net repository and noticed that this
head had appeared in the git repository. I don't know where it came from
but it looks like it was an artifact that was still there because of the
svn -> git migration. The parents of this commit looked to me like a
c
Hi All:
I've completed all the clean ups I think were needed in the
GenericMapMessageSimple branch (the no-new-class branch).
I will merge to master tomorrow unless I hear otherwise.
Then I can look at painful it would be to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1934
Any advice there
Gary Gregory created LOG4J2-1935:
Summary: Add with(String, primitive) methods to
org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage
Key: LOG4J2-1935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1935
Pr
22 matches
Mail list logo