[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011805#comment-16011805
]
Gary Gregory edited comment on LOG4J2-1866 at 5/16/17 6:13 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011805#comment-16011805
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1866:
--
[~ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]: Are you OK wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011801#comment-16011801
]
Izek Greenfield commented on LOG4J2-1866:
-
So what your decision?
> Add default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011663#comment-16011663
]
Girish edited comment on LOG4J2-1311 at 5/16/17 3:00 AM:
-
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011663#comment-16011663
]
Girish edited comment on LOG4J2-1311 at 5/16/17 2:54 AM:
-
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011663#comment-16011663
]
Girish commented on LOG4J2-1311:
Thanks Gary for suggesting. We are already using 2.7, ho
Makes sense to me!
On 15 May 2017 at 11:52, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I’d prefer log4j-plugins over log4j-tools.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On May 15, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, it seems like the easiest thing to do would be to add it to
> > log4j-tools or something. I just imported my
I’d prefer log4j-plugins over log4j-tools.
Ralph
> On May 15, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Yeah, it seems like the easiest thing to do would be to add it to
> log4j-tools or something. I just imported my git repo from work and
> published the source so I have somewhere to start.
>
Yeah, it seems like the easiest thing to do would be to add it to
log4j-tools or something. I just imported my git repo from work and
published the source so I have somewhere to start.
On 15 May 2017 at 11:37, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Why are you doing this as your own project? This could easily be
Why are you doing this as your own project? This could easily be hosted here.
Ralph
> On May 15, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I wrote a pretty trivial Slack webhook appender at work and was given the
> go ahead to publish it as open source. It's not as fully fleshed out as the
> Htt
And maybe flush it out as a Log4j log4j-slack module? ;-)
Gary
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> You need to ask MC for permission for your group id.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> I should note that I haven't figured out how to relea
You need to ask MC for permission for your group id.
Gary
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I should note that I haven't figured out how to release this on Maven
> Central yet, so the README is still somewhat specific to our internal
> repository.
>
> On 15 May 2017 at 11:30
Transitive dependencies are always subordinate to dependencies specified in the
pom so changing the order would never matter.
What makes you think this has anything to do with dependency versions?
Ralph
> On May 15, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I _was_ worth a try :-(
>
> On Mon
I should note that I haven't figured out how to release this on Maven
Central yet, so the README is still somewhat specific to our internal
repository.
On 15 May 2017 at 11:30, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I wrote a pretty trivial Slack webhook appender at work and was given the
> go ahead to publish it
I wrote a pretty trivial Slack webhook appender at work and was given the
go ahead to publish it as open source. It's not as fully fleshed out as the
HttpAppender idea, but nevertheless, it may be useful for someone:
https://github.com/jvz/log4j-slack
--
Matt Sicker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16010800#comment-16010800
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1311:
--
Hi Girish,
Can you please try the current v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16010791#comment-16010791
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1909:
--
What is this ticket about?
Does %nano not d
I _was_ worth a try :-(
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Mikael Ståldal
wrote:
> I tried to move it to the very end, it did not help.
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > What if you move that dep to the end? Maybe its transitive deps overrides
> > over jars.
> >
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16010768#comment-16010768
]
Girish commented on LOG4J2-1311:
Is there any resolution to this, we are also facing simi
tsimba kely created LOG4J2-1909:
---
Summary: nano second in log4j
Key: LOG4J2-1909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1909
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: New Feature
Compon
I tried to move it to the very end, it did not help.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> What if you move that dep to the end? Maybe its transitive deps overrides
> over jars.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Mikael Ståldal >
> wrote:
>
> > In branch LOG4J2-1442
What if you move that dep to the end? Maybe its transitive deps overrides
over jars.
Gary
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Mikael Ståldal
wrote:
> In branch LOG4J2-1442 (HttpAppender), some unit tests in log4j-core fail. I
> guess that's because I have added this test dependency (which has a lo
In branch LOG4J2-1442 (HttpAppender), some unit tests in log4j-core fail. I
guess that's because I have added this test dependency (which has a lot of
transitive dependencies):
com.github.tomakehurst
wiremock
test
2.6.0
Any ideas what may cause these failures?
[ERROR]
AsyncLoggerConf
23 matches
Mail list logo