On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Ahh well *generating* the pom.xml from the ruby-maven sounds like a
> great solution! That would certainly be less work to maintain over
> time, and those of us maintaining it will have ruby-maven available
> anyway.
>
> Let me know
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> Great progress, kristian...I'm poking at it a bit right now!
>
> I agree with the XML getting rather ugly, especially when we have a
> lot of custom build steps. The only problems I see with using
> ruby-maven are obviously bootstrapp
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> wrote:
>> * *INVOKER.class files that act as method handles (these will probably
>> go away once we're Java 7+ only)
>
> Android?
Yeah, good point. We can always fall back on reflec
