JIRA Access

2019-01-03 Thread Charlie Black
I am currently acting as a product manager for geode native client component. I was wondering if I could have edit privileges for the Geode JIRA? Thanks, Charlie -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: JIRA Access

2019-01-03 Thread Charlie Black
Dan, Awesome and thanks! My username is charliemblack Charlie On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:17 PM Dan Smith wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > Sure, what's your user name in the apache JIRA? > > -Dan > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Charlie Black wrote: > > > I am cu

Re: Apache Geode PMC quarterly report: DRAFT for your review

2019-02-13 Thread Charlie Black
; > > > > iss...@geode.apache.org: > > > - 55 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months): > > > - 3342 emails sent to list (4259 in previous quarter) > > > - > > > > > > notificati...@geode.apache.org: > > > - 7 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months): > > > - 2500 emails sent to list (1865 in previous quarter) > > > - > > > > > > u...@geode.apache.org: > > > - 250 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months): > > > - 94 emails sent to list (212 in previous quarter) > > > > > > JIRA activity: > > > > > > - 357 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months > > > - 314 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Dependency review for release 1.9.0

2019-02-28 Thread Charlie Black
a.jar > > > > > > Removed: > > > > > > activation-1.1.1 > > > jaxb-core-2.2.11.jar > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/License+Guide+for+Contributors > > < > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/License+Guide+for+Contributors > > > > > > > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: InternalCacheTransactionManager2PC removed from public API

2019-04-17 Thread Charlie Black
2:57 > > Prima: dev@geode.apache.org > > Predmet: InternalCacheTransactionManager2PC removed from public API > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can you tell me why is this header removed from geode native public API ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3421), > > > > and how we can use XA transactions (2PC) in geode native? > > > > > > BR, > > > > Mario > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.0 RC4

2019-04-24 Thread Charlie Black
://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.9.0.RC4>> > > > >> > > > >> Maven staging repo: > > > >> > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > > < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054> > > < > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > > < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Geode's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > >> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS < > > > https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS> < > > > >> https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS < > > > https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Signed the release with GPG fingerprint: > > > >> > > > >> DB5476815A475574577D442B468A4800EAFB2498 > > > >> > > > >> PS: Command to run geode-examples: ./gradlew -PgeodeReleaseUrl= > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.9.0.RC4 < > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.9.0.RC4> < > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.9.0.RC4 < > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.9.0.RC4>> > > > >> -PgeodeRepositoryUrl= > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > > < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054> > > < > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > > < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1054 > > >> > > > >> build > > > >> runAll > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> - Owen & Dan > > > > > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Static Analysis Tools such as SonarQube or others?

2019-06-04 Thread Charlie Black
ions. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:56 AM Peter Tran wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Has anyone had experience using static analysis tools such as > SonarQube? > > > Were there helpful? And favourites that worked well? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Static Analysis Tools such as SonarQube or others?

2019-06-05 Thread Charlie Black
report with a bunch of rule violations. > > Yes - Love this idea! > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:46 PM Charlie Black wrote: > > > I used SonarQube on a project it helped the team where to focus on next. > > The reports that it generates are extremely useful to h

Re: [DISCUSS] Add a test dependency to geode-core - ArchUnit

2019-06-21 Thread Charlie Black
gt;>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bill, Ernie, and I would like to add a new (apache licensed) test > >>>>>>> dependency to geode-core - https://github.com/TNG/ArchUnit. This > is a > >>>>>> tool > >>>>>>> that lets you write tests that make assertions about the > >>>>>> interdependencies > >>>>>>> of your code - for example enforcing that package A does not > depend on > >>>>>>> package B. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Initially we intend to add some tests about what parts of the > system the > >>>>>>> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.membership package depends > on, with > >>>>>>> an eye towards making that code more independently testable > (proposal on > >>>>>>> that coming soon!). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Does anyone have an issue with adding this test dependency? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Dan > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: [DISCUSS] what region types to support in the new management rest api

2019-08-20 Thread Charlie Black
n types we have: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> LOCAL, > > >>>>>>> LOCAL_PERSISTENT, > > >>>>>>> LOCAL_HEAP_LRU, > > >>>>>>> LOCAL_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> LOCAL_PERSISTENT_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> PARTITION, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_REDUNDANT, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_PERSISTENT, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_REDUNDANT_PERSISTENT, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_REDUNDANT_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_PERSISTENT_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_REDUNDANT_PERSISTENT_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_HEAP_LRU, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_REDUNDANT_HEAP_LRU, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE, > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE_PERSISTENT, > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE_PERSISTENT_OVERFLOW, > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE_HEAP_LRU, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE_PROXY, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_PROXY, > > >>>>>>> PARTITION_PROXY_REDUNDANT, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In region management rest api, especially in PCC world, we are > > >>>>> wondering > > >>>>>>> 1) should we allow users to create LOCAL* regions through > > >>> management > > >>>>> rest > > >>>>>>> api? > > >>>>>>> 2) should we allow users to create *PROXY regions through > > >>> management > > >>>>> rest > > >>>>>>> api? > > >>>>>>> 3) for the rest of the PARTITION* and REPLICATE* types, should we > > >>>>> strive > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>> keep the region type list the same as before, or only keep the > > >> type > > >>>> as > > >>>>>>> REPLICATE/PARTITION, but use other properties like > > >> "redundantCopy" > > >>>> and > > >>>>>>> "evictionAction" to allow different permutations of region > > >>>> attributes? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> comments appreciated! > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Jinmei > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Cheers > > >>> > > >>> Jinmei > > >>> > > >> > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: [DISCUSS] GEODE-7241 - make Jar not War?

2019-09-25 Thread Charlie Black
nstead :) > > Ok I think this constitutes consensus on GWAR! ;) > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

2019-11-19 Thread Charlie Black
new config property "ssl-server-name-extension". > > This property will contain generic string, which will be added as Server > Name Indication (SNI) parameter to Client Hello message. > > Do you agree with this proposal? > > Thanks, > Mario > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

2019-11-19 Thread Charlie Black
CV707Igt5WbMQyay_8vOtB9nH8cLBgAM&s=PjLj2CJYNHbQUiMKrd-FKMqwbuxVERJifxQWpM4HM8k&e=> > > > BR, > Mario > -- > *Šalje:* Charlie Black > *Poslano:* 19. studenog 2019. 17:24 > *Prima:* dev@geode.apache.org > *Predmet:* Re: Proposal of new config property &

Re: Odg: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

2019-11-19 Thread Charlie Black
: > > This property will contain generic string, which will be added as Server > Name Indication (SNI) parameter to ClientHello message. > ClientHello message is part of SSL handshake. > > Mario > ---------- > *Šalje:* Charlie Black > *Poslano:* 19

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule

2019-11-22 Thread Charlie Black
e deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule

2019-11-22 Thread Charlie Black
now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > >

Proposals - Request For Comments (RFC) process

2019-12-02 Thread Charlie Black
doing the right thing. The Apache Geode Improvement Process. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Lightweight+RFC+Process Charlie -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

2019-12-04 Thread Charlie Black
is because Geode incorrectly assumes there are no more alive servers when > just one of them is down (since they share hostname-for-senders and port). > > Sees like at the worst case when it tries to reconnect the LB should give > it a live server and it think the single server is back up. > > -Jake > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: Importance of Diffie-Hellman support in native client?

2019-12-05 Thread Charlie Black
roperties here, and any knowledge of them has long since left the team. > Does anyone have a clue, or informed opinion, as to the importance of > keeping this support and the associated properties? > > Thanks, > > Blake > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: New geode-gfsh module

2019-12-09 Thread Charlie Black
dated to use the new v2 API's, which should not > > have any direct dependency on geode-core any more. > > > > > > On 12/6/19 10:01 AM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Dec 6, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Just to be clear, this effort does *not* result in a standalone gfsh > > >>> executable/jar. > > >> Is this a future plan? > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: enable-time-statistics

2020-01-10 Thread Charlie Black
-time-statistics=true > > >> > > >> > > >> Note: Time-based statistics can impact system performance and is not > > >> recommended for production environments. > > >> > > >> > > >> Do you know on which part this n

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

2020-04-08 Thread Charlie Black
> While GA > > > isn't open source, it is commonly used by other Apache projects. > Apache > > > Cassandra, Kafka, Samza and Spark all have GA trackers on their > website. > > > > > > I've heard rumors that we at some point had it on our website as > well. Is > > > this true? If so, why did we remove it? > > > > > > Thank you for your thoughts and concerns! > > > > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-29 Thread Charlie Black
+1 to "removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface" If someone offers to take on the completion of the "experimental Protobuf client/server interface" in a timely manner, then I would say hold off on removing. As for the other removal items that were brought up. Please rai

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-29 Thread Charlie Black
+ 1 to additional repos for extensions to Geode project to keep "extensions" or bolt-ons out of the Apache Geode. I also have extensions that aren't committed to Geode.So definably a vibrant community surrounding Geode. What todo with the code: Just link to the branch/sha/fork/first a

Re: DISCUSSION: Geode Native C++ 17 adoption

2021-05-04 Thread Charlie Black
Another viewpoint is this is a library and that library can be used by older applications. So being cutting edge on the complier on the library does not increase the adoption of Geode. Agree with Alberto that users mailing lists should be consulted. Charlie From: Alberto Gomez Date: Tuesda

[jira] [Created] (GEODE-2770) When using the REST API it is possible for the API to be accepting requests after the system has shutdown

2017-04-10 Thread Charlie Black (JIRA)
Charlie Black created GEODE-2770: Summary: When using the REST API it is possible for the API to be accepting requests after the system has shutdown Key: GEODE-2770 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

[jira] [Updated] (GEODE-2770) When using the REST API it is possible for the API to be accepting requests after the system has shutdown

2017-04-10 Thread Charlie Black (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Charlie Black updated GEODE-2770: - Description: When using the REST API it is possible for the API to be accepting requests after