Hi,
I'd appreciate some more feedback on this published RFC about "Introduce
monitoring of async writer thread":
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Introduce+monitoring+of+async+writer+thread
Thanks in advance.
Mario
Hello devs!
Please review this RFC:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Migration+from+springfox+to+springdoc
on migrating from springfox to springdoc for our swagger needs and provide any
feedback you have.
Review period until Friday, May 13th.
—Patrick Johnson
The PRs to remove this module have been approved merged - from geode,
geode-benchmarks, and geode-examples.
-Dan
From: Dan Smith
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:06 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
Since it seems
Thanks for your proposal, Patrick!
I wonder if this even warrants a proposal over a PR. There seems to be neither
a downside nor a realistic alternative.
From: Patrick Johnson
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 13:39
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] RFC for
+1. Thanks for the RFC. Looks good.
Since there is no big impact; does this need to wait till May 13th on this. In
this case is it good enough to wait for couple of approval. Say, 3 😊
-Anil.
From: Alexander Murmann
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 4:09 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [
It would be great to make the switch to springdoc. If you are willing, go for
it!
Slightly outside the scope of this RFC:
Swagger was added as part of the @Experimental manageability REST API [1] and
is used to generate API docs for each minor [2]. It looks like the API hasn’t
changed much bet
>Does this inactivity demonstrate maturity (i.e. maybe we should remove the
>@Experimental annotation) or does it indicate a failed or abandoned experiment
Neither, I believe k8s is using the feature, but the inactivity simply means we
haven’t allocated people to work on it.
From: Owen Nichols
