Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

Hi all, just to remind on this topic. Could we expand list of CODEOWNERS in some areas that are bottleneck. For examples I have 2 PR`s that are waiting on review from WAN area for several weeks: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6013 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6048 BR, Mario _

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless someone is going to pick it up soon and complete it. As Dan pointed out, we already have a good interface for storing Json documents and we never

Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

We will get these approved as soon as possible. Regards, Nabarun From: Mario Ivanac Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 4:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Hi all, just to remind on this topic. Could we expand list

Precheckin job failed to fork JVM during compile

https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/17742 core dumped during compilation of one of the modules. I believe exit code 134 means that it failed to fork a new Java VM. I wonder what would cause a test job to be unable to fork a process. It seems to have forked processes for compiling all of

Re: Precheckin job failed to fork JVM during compile

Hi Kirk, This has been happening intermittently with the latest Liberica JDK8u282 since it was released. I worked with the folks at LIberica to reproduce the issue and they have a fix which will be included in their next release, sometime in April. Donal From: K