[PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Ju@N
Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8029 [1] to the *support/1.12* and *support/1.13* branches. The fix has been merged into develop through commit bc0090dc93643fd4d09c79a4b0c29d883172b546 [2], and it's basically to make sure we delete unused drfs upon initialization to prevent the prol

Commit revert etiquette

2020-06-10 Thread Jens Deppe
Hello friends, Just recently I’ve noticed a couple of PRs submitted that were intended to revert flaky or suspected commits. Initially, these PRs were simply marked as ‘Revert’ without any further detail. I’m not sure if there was any additional out-of-band communication but I would like to req

Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Owen Nichols
+1 On 6/10/20, 3:18 AM, "Ju@N" wrote: Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8029 to the *support/1.12* and *support/1.13* branches. The fix has been merged into develop through commit bc0090dc93643fd4d09c79a4b0c29d883172b546, and it's basically to make sure we

Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On Jun 10, 2020, 3:18 AM -0700, Ju@N , wrote: Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8029 [1] to the *support/1.12* and *support/1.13* branches. The fix has been merged into develop through commit bc0090dc93643fd4d09c79a4b0c29d883172b546 [2], and it's basically to make sure we delete un

RE: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 -Original Message- From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 9:14 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 +1 On Jun 10, 2020, 3:18 AM -0700, Ju@N , wrote: Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8029 [

Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Joris Melchior
+1 From: Ju@N Sent: June 10, 2020 6:18 To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13 Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8029 [1] to the *support/1.12* and *support/1.13* branches. The fix has been

Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Dave Barnes
Looks like the community approves, Ju@n. Go ahead and merge. Thanks, Dave On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:37 AM Joris Melchior wrote: > +1 > > From: Ju@N > Sent: June 10, 2020 6:18 > To: dev@geode.apache.org > Subject: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12

Re: [PROPOSAL]: BackPort GEODE-8029 to support/1.12 and support/1.13

2020-06-10 Thread Ju@N
Thanks everyone!. I've cherry picked the commit into branches support/1.12[1] and support/1.13[2]. Best regards. [1]: https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/bdeff9d6144c47ea687cf3b7d25f12598228 [2]: https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/7c1ffd528ff72b920dd606604de2a744c1728b23 On Wed, 10 Ju

Re: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12

2020-06-10 Thread Bill Burcham
Ernie made us a ticket for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8240 On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:59 PM Alberto Gomez wrote: > Hi Ernie, > > I have seen this problem in the support/1.13 branch and also on develop. > > Interestingly, the patch I sent is applied seamlessly in my lo

[INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results.

2020-06-10 Thread Mark Hanson
Hello All, I have been doing bulk test runs of DistributedTestOpenJDK8, in this case over 200. Here is a simplified report to kind of help you see what I am seeing and I think everybody sees with random failures as part of the PR process. It is very easy to cause failures like this by not knowi