Re: Creating Regions Dynamically

Hello there, The regions manually created using the Geode API are not persisted to the *cluster-configuration-service [1]*, that's basically the reason why you don't see them after the server is restarted. It's possible to dig into the source code and persist the changes yourself (have a look at t

Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages

Hi, The recently approved RFC about patch releases (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Shipping+patch+releases) says the following about what changes should and should not be backported to a support branch: What changes should be back ported to a support branch? The community w

Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx

Hi geode-dev, We are working on implementing a new feature regarding to this RFC. The main idea is to combine the TLS and access control features, but to use the certificate subject common name for access control

Re: Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages

Serialization changes are only permitted in new minor releases (x.y.0). > On May 22, 2020, at 4:40 AM, Alberto Gomez wrote: > > Hi, > > The recently approved RFC about patch releases > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Shipping+patch+releases) > says the following about wha

Re: Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / messages

Thanks for the quick answer, Owen. Is this information published anywhere? Cheers, -Alberto G. From: Owen Nichols Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 5:56 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions about patch releases and changes in serialization versions / me

[PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13

I’ve been asked to propose backporting these changes to the 1.13 branch.  This is a security issue – endpoint verification in servers is currently broken.  That is, if you enable it you’re unable to start up a cluster. Endpoint verification requires the server-side of a tcp/ip connection to

Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13

Sorry about the weird link - this is PR 5131 On 5/22/20, 1:33 PM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote: I’ve been asked to propose backporting these changes to the 1.13 branch. This is a security issue – endpoint verification in servers is currently broken. That is, if you enable it you’re unabl

Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13

In general, proposals to backport are more likely to get votes when the fix is already on develop and has been through some testing, especially as support/1.13 is (hopefully) getting close to RC1. We’ve already seen several reverts on the support branch due to hasty backporting... I’d love to

Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8144 changes to 1.13

Yes, for sure it won't be backported until its gone through the build pipeline and is green. Do you think I should withdraw this proposal until that process completes? On 5/22/20, 2:27 PM, "Owen Nichols" wrote: In general, proposals to backport are more likely to get votes when the fix

[DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start

Hi Geode community, I have posted on the wiki a new RFC about implementing a new option for serial gateway sender creation related with how the dispatcher threads are started. This option will be used only when gateway receivers are configured to share same host and port. This configuration was