RFC - Client side configuration for a SNI proxy

2020-03-06 Thread Bill Burcham
Please review the RFC for *Client side configuration for a SNI proxy*: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy Please comment by Monday, March 9, 2020. Regards, Bill and Ernie

Re: RFC - Client side configuration for a SNI proxy

2020-03-06 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Hi there Bill, Whilst I commend your enthusiasm. Giving the community a weekend to review an RFC is less than optimal. Please extend you deadline until 13 March 2020. Which is more reasonable. --Udo On 3/6/20 11:04 AM, Bill Burcham wrote: Please review the RFC for *Client side configuration

Re: [PROPOSAL] eliminate file count loophole in PR StressNewTest

2020-03-06 Thread Donal Evans
With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged ( https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test that has resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline (JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/issues/GEODE-7843). The PR was quite large a

Re: [PROPOSAL] eliminate file count loophole in PR StressNewTest

2020-03-06 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:33 PM Donal Evans wrote: > With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged ( > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test that has > resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline (JIRA > ticket: https://issues.apache.org/

Re: [PROPOSAL] eliminate file count loophole in PR StressNewTest

2020-03-06 Thread Donal Evans
With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged ( https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test that has resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline (JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/issues/GEODE-7843). The PR was quite large a