Re: [PDE West] Re: [PDE East] Geode Conference - Double the Expected Attendance

2017-12-05 Thread Jagdish Mirani
Adding Pivotal events team: Katheryn Efird, Katie Nelson (plus all the others who helped with this behind the scenes) Mike's e-mail and the comments that followed just about said it all. A HUGE thanks for your contribution to this. Regards Jag On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Ivan Novick wrote:

Re: DISCUSS: Deprecating and replacing current serializable string encodings

2017-12-05 Thread Jacob Barrett
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:52 PM Dan Smith wrote: > The new protocol is currently translating from PDX->JSON before sending > results to the clients so the client doesn't have to understand PDX or > DataSerializable. > For now it does, but we all know that isn't a longer term viable solution. We w

Re: DISCUSS: Deprecating and replacing current serializable string encodings

2017-12-05 Thread Jacob Barrett
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:45 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > Anything that breaks data on disk is also a big PITA. This change would > break data on disk. Changing the on wire serialization format doesn't necessitate changing the on disk format. While it would be easier or more performant to have them

Geode tests completed in pipeline with non-zero exit code

2017-12-05 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/AcceptanceTest/builds/12

Geode tests completed in pipeline with non-zero exit code

2017-12-05 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/FlakyTest/builds/11

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #757 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2264 tests)

2017-12-05 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #757 was successful. --- Scheduled 2266 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-757/ -- This

Re: [DISCUSS] FunctionAdapter incompatible serialVersionUID

2017-12-05 Thread Jason Huynh
I've sent in a pull request for this: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/1119 I've added the old serialVersionUID to the FunctionAdapter, under the assumption that anyone in 1.0-1.3 would have seen that the FunctionAdapter had been deprecated and not used it. The 1.0-1.3 users could also easily

[DISCUSS] Proposal to Deprecate Hash Index

2017-12-05 Thread Jason Huynh
This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the create hash index apis. Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not a traditional hash look up index, but more of memory savings index. The index does not store index keys in memory and must hash the keys every t

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to Deprecate Hash Index

2017-12-05 Thread Dan Smith
+1 -Dan On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the > create hash index apis. > > > Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not a traditional > hash look up index, but more of memory savings index. The

Geode tests completed in pipeline with non-zero exit code

2017-12-05 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/DistributedTest/builds/11

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to Deprecate Hash Index

2017-12-05 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 > > -Dan > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > > This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the > > create hash index apis. > > > > > > Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not